KUWAIT:  The Kuwaiti Ministry of Interior announced on Wednesday the seizure of approximately 200 kg of meth and vitamin, valued at over KD 1.5 million (about USD 4.8 million), from an Asian suspect.

This operation was part of efforts led by First Deputy Prime Minister Sheikh Fahad Yousef Saud Al-Sabah to combat drug trafficking.

The General Department of Narcotics Control acted on precise information, leading to the arrest of the suspect in Al-Raqqa, where the drugs were hidden. Investigations revealed that the suspect had rented vehicles for distribution and storage, receiving instructions from abroad.

This confiscation is among the largest in Kuwait, and the Ministry is committed to continuing its campaigns against narcotics trafficking to protect society. -KUNA

NEW YORK: Kuwait and Iraq have reaffirmed this week their commitment to resolving the long-standing humanitarian issues stemming from the 1990 Iraqi invasion of Kuwait—specifically the cases of missing persons and lost national archives—while expressing differing views on the best path forward. In a meeting with ambassadors of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council and the European Union, Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani said his government “places great importance on Iraq’s relations with Kuwait” and is working to address “the file of missing Kuwaiti persons and lost Kuwaiti property, including the national archives.” The Prime Minister emphasized Baghdad’s approach to resolving the issue “in the framework of bilateral cooperation,” according to a statement from his office.

His remarks followed a Security Council session in New York, during which Kuwait’s Permanent Representative to the UN, Ambassador Tareq Al-Bannai, called for continued UN engagement on the file. “These issues are not political disputes or bilateral disagreements, but humanitarian matters,” Al-Bannai said. “The families of the missing and victims deserve justice and answers regarding the fate of their loved ones.”

Al-Bannai added: “An entire nation is awaiting the return of its national archives, which are integral to restoring Kuwait’s historical memory. This is not just symbolic—it is a cornerstone for preserving Kuwait’s collective memory. Any delay in this matter undermines the historical justice we are seeking.”

The council session also featured a briefing by the Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General in Iraq, Mohamed Al-Hassan, who welcomed “the increase in field operations and the use of advanced technology to locate possible burial sites of missing Kuwaitis,” and called for “intensified efforts and enhanced coordination—including the search for witnesses to help locate the remains of 315 individuals still missing.”

Al-Hassan also noted the importance of accelerating the return of missing Kuwaiti property, including the archives, in light of “the recently welcomed decision to reactivate the joint Kuwait-Iraq committee on missing Kuwaiti property.”

In his remarks to the council, Al-Bannai underlined that the matter requires continued international attention. “These are inalienable rights that do not expire with time and should not be subject to political calculations or procedural delays,” he said. “Ending this suffering requires genuine will—turning words into tangible actions, free from procrastination and stalling.”

Al-Bannai also reiterated Kuwait’s support for the Secretary-General’s recommendation to appoint a senior UN official to follow up on these files after the UNAMI mandate ends in December 2025. He stated that such a mechanism “would yield more effective and concrete results, maintain momentum, and ensure sustained efforts toward the desired outcomes.” “Kuwait believes bilateral cooperation with Iraq remains essential,” Al-Bannai said, “but UN follow-up through the Security Council is indispensable.” As of now, both Iraq and Kuwait have expressed their commitment to resolving the files, but continue to differ on the appropriate mechanism. Iraq has favored bilateral arrangements, while Kuwait has stressed the role of the UN and the Security Council in ensuring progress on what it describes as a humanitarian matter. — Agencies

KUWAIT: From July 1, 2025, expatriate workers in Kuwait’s private sector will need an exit permit from their sponsor to leave the country. The regulation aims to streamline departures and protect both employer and employee rights. Reactions to the new measure have been mixed. Speaking to Kuwait Times, employer Adel Suliman voiced support for the decision, while emphasizing the need for further system enhancements. “I hope leave types can be categorized into ‘internal’ and ‘external’. Some workers request annual leave but remain in the country, and in such cases, sponsors should not be held legally responsible,” he said, calling for a digitalized process to minimize administrative burdens on employers.

Employer Homoud Al-Ajmi also praised the move, highlighting its importance for business owners. “This is an excellent step, which many responsible employers have long awaited. We also hope the regulation will include mandatory return dates for expatriate workers, with clear consequences such as residency cancellation if they overstay without employer and ministry of interior approval. Some workers take a one-month leave and return late, which causes delays in company operations. Deducting from salaries is not enough — the sponsor should be allowed to protect his business and prevent such people from coming back to the country,” he said.

Al-Ajmi further suggested that Kuwait follow the example of other Gulf countries, where overstaying a vacation can result in a five-year entry ban. “This is vital to protect national economic interests, preserve job opportunities for citizens and reduce the financial burden on the state budget,” he added.

On the other hand, business owner Abu Ali criticized the decision, suggesting it should only apply to sensitive positions such as managers, accountants or cashiers. “Why all this hassle for regular jobs? This just adds to the daily load and stress for employers. Unfortunately, this may also give visa traders an excuse to demand more money in exchange for approving workers’ leaves,” he pointed out. He advised the minister to focus more on the issue of runaway domestic workers. “There are many labor violations and financial losses due to runaway workers. There should be a way to prevent them.”

Meanwhile, expatriate workers expressed concern that the decision could be misused by employers to exert further control. “This will give more power to the sponsor to mistreat employees. I’ve been trying to get medical leave for surgery for months, but my manager keeps refusing. This policy may worsen such cases,” Salem Oudeh warned.

One worker proposed a system where the state, rather than employers, acts as the legal sponsor of expatriate workers, handling residency renewals while companies function purely as contracting entities. “This could reduce exploitation, bribery, and unjust practices against workers,” Othman Osama said.

Mohammad Saed suggested the system be applied selectively. “Instead of applying it to everyone, there should be a feature where an employer can flag a specific employee who shouldn’t be allowed to travel without their approval. Emergencies happen, and some people need to leave immediately — especially in cases of family deaths.”

As for Ahmad Aziz, overly strict regulations could stifle economic growth and flexibility. “While the move to enforce a mandatory exit permit may help regulate the labor market and protect employers’ rights, I must emphasize that strict laws and excessive red tape hinder market growth. We all want a flourishing and flexible economy — only then will the benefits truly reach everyone: workers, employers, and the country,” he said.